Results tagged “Tagging” from XXC@Blog

Introduction

編目的目的在於幫助人們發現圖書館目錄中的圖書資料資訊。主題編目是編目程序的一部份，著重於呈現文件的主題資訊，亦即，說明文獻的內容。
這種主題表徵(subject representation)是文獻取用的關鍵要素。不當的標題(subject heading)會導致檢索失靈、使用者不滿、與錯誤的處理資訊需求。

圖書館目錄中文獻的主題描述(subject description)是由編目者(cataloger)所編撰的。他們是連結文獻的作者與讀者的決定性機制，透過他們的資訊表徵工作達到資訊檢索的目的。
編目者根據標準與條件以完成文獻表徵及主題描述。
他們運用標題表(subject heading list)與分類計劃(classification schedule)達到編目的一致性，而他們也藉由選定標題與類目，透過圖書館目錄將作者與讀者的旨趣結合起來。

受到主題編目的悠久傳統所啟發，而主題決定(subject determination)的程序為何仍不確切為人所了解。本書是一個研究計劃論文，目的在解答編目者如何決定(determine)或辨識(identify)文件的主題(topic)，以及如何選擇一個適切的主題描述。

now I try to read them in this week…I hope so…..

• Abbott, R. (2004). Subjectivity as a concern for information science: A popperian perspective. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 95.
• Al-Halimi, R. K. (2004). Mining topic signals from text. Unpublished PhD, UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO (CANADA).
• Barnum, C., Henderson, E., Hood, A., & Jordan, R. (2004). Index versus full-text search: A usability study of user preference and performance. Technical Communication, 51(2), 185.
• Farrow, J. (1996). Propositional analysis and macrorules for indexing. Library Review, 45(1), 6.
• Garshol, L. M. (2004). Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic maps! Making sense of it all. Journal of Information Science, 30(4), 378.
• Jones, K. P. (1983). How do we index? A report of some aslib informatics group activity. Journal of Documentation, 39(1), 1.
• Jorgensen, C., Jaimes, A., Benitez, A. B., & Chang, S. F. (2001). A conceptual framework and empirical research for classifying visual descriptors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(11), 938.
• Lancaster, F. W. (2004). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. Technical Services Quarterly, 21(4), 97.
• Mai, J.-E. (2000a). Deconstructing the indexing process. Advances in Librarianship(23), 269-298.
• Mai, J.-E. (2000b). The subject indexing process: An investigation of problems in knowledge representation. Unpublished PhD, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN.
• Mai, J.-E. (2001). Semiotics and indexing: An analysis of the subject indexing process. Journal of Documentation, 57(5), 591-622.
• Mai, J.-E. (2004a). The future of general classification. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 37(1/2), 3.
• Mai, J.-E. (2004b). The role of domains, documents, and decisions in indexing. Paper presented at the Eight International ISKO Conference.
• Mai, J.-E. (2005). Analysis in indexing: Document and domain centered approaches. Information Processing & Management, 41(3), 599.
• Sauperl, A. (2004). Catalogers’ common ground and shared knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 55.
• Schwartz, C., & Fry, B. M. (1977). Indexing behavior-survey and state of the art. In Anonymous (Ed.), Information management in the 1980s: Proceedings of the 40th asis annual meeting, volume 14 (pp. Chicago). White Plains: New York, American Society for Information Science.
• Sensuse, D. I. (2004). A comparison of manual indexing and automatic indexing in the humanities. Unpublished PhD, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO (CANADA), TORONTO.
• Stubbs, E. A., Mangiaterra, N. E., & Martinez, A. M. (1999). Internal quality audit of indexing: A new application of interindexer consistency. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 28(4), 53.
• Zhang, W. (2004). The development and structure of the chinese thesaurus for subject indexing. International Information and Library Review, 36(1), 47.